<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I See Your Message But All I Read Is Blah, Blah, Blah</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.talstone.com/i-see-your-message-but-all-i-read-is-blah-blah-blah/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.talstone.com/i-see-your-message-but-all-i-read-is-blah-blah-blah/</link>
	<description>A Healthcare Marketing Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 22:33:30 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: tstitt</title>
		<link>http://blog.talstone.com/i-see-your-message-but-all-i-read-is-blah-blah-blah/comment-page-1/#comment-134</link>
		<dc:creator>tstitt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 21:44:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.talstone.com/?p=175#comment-134</guid>
		<description>Along with Blah Blah Blah, my other (least) favorite type of writing is Barney Blah aka &quot;we love you, you love us, let&#039;s be friends&quot; copy. While only slightly better than talking to yourself (or looking in the mirror), Barney Blah also lacks the essential conversational engagement element you describe above. Customers don&#039;t make decisions based on how an organization appears its own mirror (Blah, Blah, Blah) or whether the organization is as nice and friendly as a purple dinosaur named Barney. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Along with Blah Blah Blah, my other (least) favorite type of writing is Barney Blah aka &quot;we love you, you love us, let&#39;s be friends&quot; copy. While only slightly better than talking to yourself (or looking in the mirror), Barney Blah also lacks the essential conversational engagement element you describe above. Customers don&#39;t make decisions based on how an organization appears its own mirror (Blah, Blah, Blah) or whether the organization is as nice and friendly as a purple dinosaur named Barney.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TalstoneLisa</title>
		<link>http://blog.talstone.com/i-see-your-message-but-all-i-read-is-blah-blah-blah/comment-page-1/#comment-139</link>
		<dc:creator>TalstoneLisa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 19:26:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.talstone.com/?p=175#comment-139</guid>
		<description>Thanks Lorraine - I totally agree. Often jargon slips in or a misunderstanding about the reading levels of the audience is apparent.

Everyone expects your service to be &quot;quality&quot; or &quot;the best&quot; - you have to dig deeper to reach the USP that truly resonates and raises the bar. After all, there&#039;s quite a bit of noise out there.

Really appreciate your thoughts!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Lorraine &#8211; I totally agree. Often jargon slips in or a misunderstanding about the reading levels of the audience is apparent.</p>
<p>Everyone expects your service to be &#8220;quality&#8221; or &#8220;the best&#8221; &#8211; you have to dig deeper to reach the USP that truly resonates and raises the bar. After all, there&#8217;s quite a bit of noise out there.</p>
<p>Really appreciate your thoughts!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TalstoneLisa</title>
		<link>http://blog.talstone.com/i-see-your-message-but-all-i-read-is-blah-blah-blah/comment-page-1/#comment-137</link>
		<dc:creator>TalstoneLisa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 19:15:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.talstone.com/?p=175#comment-137</guid>
		<description>I like the term &quot;Barney Blah&quot; - that&#039;s great. I&#039;ll have to remember that. There&#039;s more opportunity than ever for organizations to have actual, authentic conversations with their audience to find out what their needs are. It&#039;s a different dynamic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the term &#8220;Barney Blah&#8221; &#8211; that&#8217;s great. I&#8217;ll have to remember that. There&#8217;s more opportunity than ever for organizations to have actual, authentic conversations with their audience to find out what their needs are. It&#8217;s a different dynamic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lorraine</title>
		<link>http://blog.talstone.com/i-see-your-message-but-all-i-read-is-blah-blah-blah/comment-page-1/#comment-135</link>
		<dc:creator>Lorraine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 16:03:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.talstone.com/?p=175#comment-135</guid>
		<description>Great post. 
 
&quot;The problem is, quite a few organizations fall prey to the belief that their audience thinks just like them...&quot; 
 
 Yes. Part of the issue is  &quot;The Curse of Knowledge,&quot; as Chip and Dan Heath call it in their book Made to Stick. 
In many healthcare organizations  physicians sign off on concept and even copy. Though they don&#039;t think so, docs like copy that&#039;s positioned for other physicians, ergo the--to them--collegial medicalese that&#039;s so alienating to patients. 
 
I always tell clients that superb products and service do not a USP make. In an extremely competitive market--I write for NYC healthcare organizations--an outstanding offering is the baseline, not the differentiating factor. 
 
Beside, EVERYONE claims world-class, cutting-edge, innovative, blah, blah. If not quantified, such claims lack credibility. 
 
Copy must always start with the patient--her fears, hopes, needs and wants--BEFORE moving on to offer medical services or pharmaceuticals as the solution. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post. </p>
<p>&quot;The problem is, quite a few organizations fall prey to the belief that their audience thinks just like them&#8230;&quot; </p>
<p> Yes. Part of the issue is  &quot;The Curse of Knowledge,&quot; as Chip and Dan Heath call it in their book Made to Stick.<br />
In many healthcare organizations  physicians sign off on concept and even copy. Though they don&#039;t think so, docs like copy that&#039;s positioned for other physicians, ergo the&#8211;to them&#8211;collegial medicalese that&#039;s so alienating to patients. </p>
<p>I always tell clients that superb products and service do not a USP make. In an extremely competitive market&#8211;I write for NYC healthcare organizations&#8211;an outstanding offering is the baseline, not the differentiating factor. </p>
<p>Beside, EVERYONE claims world-class, cutting-edge, innovative, blah, blah. If not quantified, such claims lack credibility. </p>
<p>Copy must always start with the patient&#8211;her fears, hopes, needs and wants&#8211;BEFORE moving on to offer medical services or pharmaceuticals as the solution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
